The least contested site we run, because almost nobody has bothered. That is an opportunity and a warning in equal measure - a market with no competitors is often a market with no audience, and we should find out which this is.
Authoritative, complete, national, and free. Every frequency and licensee, straight from the source.
| where | verdict | why |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | LOSING | They are the record. We are reading it. On any question of fact about a licence or a frequency, they win and should. |
| Local interpretation | WINNING | They tell you a transmitter exists. We tell you whether it reaches Smithville through the pines, which is the question actually being asked. |
| Usability | WINNING | A licence database is not a reader experience. Ours is written for somebody deciding where to put an antenna. |
Where the actual scene lives - nets, meetings, testing sessions, and the people who know which repeater is up this week.
| where | verdict | why |
|---|---|---|
| Currency | LOSING | They know what happened last night. We know what was published. |
| Reachability | WINNING | Several club sites we checked did not respond at all. That is not a boast - it is why our page asks people to send us their net and testing dates rather than pretending we have them. |
| Standing | LOSING | We are not part of that community and have not earned a place in it. Listing their events accurately and for free is the only honest way in. |
SpaceX publishes availability and pricing for the service, from six miles up the road.
| where | verdict | why |
|---|---|---|
| Neutrality | WINNING | We cover it as infrastructure, factually, without advocating for or against the company - which in this county is the only version worth reading and the only one that will not lose half the audience. |
| Detail | LOSING | They have the real numbers on capacity and availability. We have what they publish. |